United States v. Bagley

469 U.S. 1084, 105 S. Ct. 587, 83 L. Ed. 2d 697, 53 U.S.L.W. 3435, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4734

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bagley. Read the opinion of the Court — 473 U.S. 667 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 10, 1984·No. No. 84-48·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1016.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Thomas W. Hillier II, Esquire, of Seattle, Wash., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bagley, 469 U.S. 1084, 105 S. Ct. 587, 83 L. Ed. 2d 697, 53 U.S.L.W. 3435, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 4734 (1984).

Pincite

469 U.S. 1084 (United States v. Bagley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.