United States v. Baeza-Gama
This text of 140 F. App'x 743 (United States v. Baeza-Gama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[744]*744MEMORANDUM
Fidel Baeza-Gama appeals his 57-month sentence following his guilty plea to Unlawful Reentry of a Deported Alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Therefore, under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) and United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 2005 WL 1579507 (9th Cir. July 7, 2005), we remand for the limited purpose of making that determination.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 F. App'x 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baeza-gama-ca9-2005.