United States v. Badillo

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Badillo

330 F. App'x 882

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 22, 2009·No. Nos. 08-15003, 08-15138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Adolfo Badillo in these consolidated direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeals are without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Badillo’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Adolfo Badillo in these consolidated direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeals are without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Badillo’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Badillo, 330 F. App'x 882 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

330 F. App'x 882 (United States v. Badillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related