United States v. Bacon
This text of 175 F. App'x 855 (United States v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Douglas Steven Bacon appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 105-month sentence for possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Bacon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bacon has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 F. App'x 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bacon-ca9-2006.