United States v. Awbery
This text of 163 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Awbery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Christopher J. Awbery appeals the 270-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count 1), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Count 2).
The district court added two levels to Awbery’s base offense level based upon a quantity of drugs not established by his guilty plea nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As Awbery preserved his Sixth Amendment challenge to the calculation of the sentencing range based on the quantity of drugs determined by the sentencing judge, he is entitled to a new sentencing hearing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Therefore, we VACATE the sentence imposed by the district court, and REMAND for resentenc[554]*554ing consistent with Booker. United States v. Kortgaard, 425 F.3d 602, 610-11 (9th Cir.2005).
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-awbery-ca9-2006.