United States v. Aviles-Jaimes

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Aviles-Jaimes

112 F. App'x 341

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 2004

Docket04-50385

StatusUnpublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 112 F. App'x 341 (United States v. Aviles-Jaimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Aviles-Jaimes, 112 F. App'x 341 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Aviles-Jaimes concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Aviles-Jaimes concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 F. App'x 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aviles-jaimes-ca5-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack