United States v. Avila
This text of 56 F. App'x 346 (United States v. Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ediberto Avila appeals the district court’s refusal to grant him a downward departure when imposing a 77-month sentence arising from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry of a removed alien under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because contrary to Avila’s contention, the district court acknowledged its discretion to depart downward in sentencing him for illegal reentry, and exercised its discretion in refusing to do so. See United States v. Garcia-Garcia, 927 F.2d 489, 490-91 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam). In addition, the district court considered Avila’s request for a downward departure in ordering that his 18-month sentence for violating supervised release run concurrently with his 77-month sentence.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avila-ca9-2003.