United States v. Avery Edwards

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2024
Docket23-3618
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Avery Edwards (United States v. Avery Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Avery Edwards, (8th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-3618 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Avery Jamal Edwards

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________

Submitted: October 21, 2024 Filed: November 14, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Avery Edwards pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and received a 96-month prison sentence. He argues that the base offense level the district court1 adopted was too high because his prior Arkansas

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. conviction of delivering methamphetamine is not a “controlled substance offense” under the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A), 4B1.2(b)(1).

As Edwards candidly admits, United States v. Henderson, 11 F.4th 713, 717– 19 (8th Cir. 2021), stands in the way of his argument. We held there that, under the “plain meaning” of the Sentencing Guidelines, a “controlled substance offense” covers more than what is prohibited by federal law alone. Id. at 719. It also “include[s] prior convictions for controlled substance offenses ‘under . . . state law,’” id. (quoting U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)), regardless of what the federal drug schedules say, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 811, 812. Following Henderson’s reasoning, Edwards’s conviction for delivering methamphetamine counts. See Ark. Code §§ 5- 64-422, 5-64-419. We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Isaiah Henderson
11 F.4th 713 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Avery Edwards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avery-edwards-ca8-2024.