United States v. Averett

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Averett

524 F. App'x 492

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 25, 2013·No. No. 12-12544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Scott Linton, appointed counsel for Corry Averett, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Aver-ett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Scott Linton, appointed counsel for Corry Averett, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Aver-ett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Averett, 524 F. App'x 492 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

524 F. App'x 492 (United States v. Averett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related