United States v. Auther Larnce King and James Albert King

417 F.2d 633
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 1969
Docket27167
StatusPublished

This text of 417 F.2d 633 (United States v. Auther Larnce King and James Albert King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Auther Larnce King and James Albert King, 417 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants appeal from a sentence of the district court following their conviction for engaging in moonshine activities. Their contentions on appeal cannot be sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court must be and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 F.2d 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-auther-larnce-king-and-james-albert-king-ca5-1969.