United States v. Austin

86 F. App'x 538
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 4, 2004·No. No. 03-3308·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant James Austin pleaded guilty to seven counts related to trafficking in crack cocaine. The District Court sentenced the Appellant to ninety-seven months imprisonment. Austin filed a notice of appeal, pro se, and his appointed counsel, Jeremy C. Gelb, Esq., filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel indicated that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

We have carefully reviewed the Appellant’s brief, along with the responsive brief of the United States and other matters of record. Austin did not file a pro se brief. We conclude, after our own review of the entire record, that the District Court did not err. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

The motion of defense counsel to withdraw will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Austin, 86 F. App'x 538 (3d Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 538 (United States v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)