United States v. Augenblick

186 Ct. Cl. 966, 180 Ct. Cl. 131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Augenblick. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 U.S. 348
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 29, 1968·No. No. 357-64·Published

Opinion

Writ of certiorari to review the action of the United States Court of Claims, 180 Ct. Cl. 131, 337 F. 2d 586 (1967), holding in its collateral attack on a court-martial conviction that because of denial by the military of plaintiff’s right to discovery under the Jencks Act plaintiff was entitled to recover back pay and allowances, less appropriate offsets. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on April 29, 1968, 390 U.S. 1038, and on January 14, 1969, 393 U.S. 348, it reversed the Court of Claims on the ground that the question of infraction of the Jencks Act does not rise to the constitutional level, it being assumed, arguendo, that such collateral attack may be made by a back pay suit in the Court of Claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Augenblick, 186 Ct. Cl. 966, 180 Ct. Cl. 131 (U.S. 1968).

186 Ct. Cl. 966 (United States v. Augenblick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Augenblick
393 U.S. 348 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Richard G. Augenblick v. The United States
377 F.2d 586 (Court of Claims, 1967)
Baines v. City of Danville, Virginia
337 F.2d 579 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)