United States v. Asuncion

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2026
Docket23-539
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Asuncion (United States v. Asuncion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Asuncion, (9th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 26 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-539 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:17-cr-02015-EFS-1 v. MEMORANDUM* JOHNNY ANDRES ASUNCION III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2024** Submission Deferred June 3, 2024 Submitted February 24, 2026 Seattle, Washington

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and W. FLETCHER and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Johnny Andres Asuncion III appeals from a resentencing for his conviction

for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii). He challenges the district court’s use of and refusal to

vacate two previous 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) convictions during the resentencing. As

the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We vacate and

remand for resentencing.

Asuncion asked us to vacate his two § 922(g)(1) convictions and to conclude

the district court erred in counting those convictions toward his criminal history

points during resentencing. We held this appeal in abeyance pending United States

v. Duarte, 137 F.4th 743 (9th Cir. 2025) (en banc), which concerned the

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1). During that time, Asuncion filed a motion to

remand, noting that he successfully obtained a writ of coram nobis from the district

court, which vacated his two felon-in-possession convictions under § 922(g)(1).

United States v. Asuncion, Nos. 2:00-cr-2166-EFS, 2:03-cr-2160-EFS, 2025 WL

2921829 (E.D. Wash. Oct. 14, 2025).

Accordingly, we grant Asuncion’s motion, and vacate and remand to the

district court for resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

2 23-539

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Steven Duarte
137 F.4th 743 (Ninth Circuit, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Asuncion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-asuncion-ca9-2026.