United States v. Asher

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Asher

111 F.2d 59, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 873, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 1940

DocketNo. 9301

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 111 F.2d 59 (United States v. Asher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Asher, 111 F.2d 59, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 873, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570 (9th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In an action by appellee, Max Asher, against appellant, the United States, appellant obtained judgment against appellee. The judgment was that appellee take nothing by his action, and that appellant have and recover of and from appellee its costs,, which, by the judgment, were taxed in the sum of $10. This appeal is from “that portion of said judgment fixing and taxing costs.”

The judgment was entered on February 27, 1939. This appeal was taken on May 26, 1939. Appellant specifies as error the District Court’s refusal “to set aside the refusal of the clerk to tax as costs an item of $í.50” claimed by appellant. That refusal (by the court) occurred on November 7, 1939, long after this appeal was taken. It, therefore, cannot be reviewed on this appeal. No other error is specified.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

In an action by appellee, Max Asher, against appellant, the United States, appellant obtained judgment against appellee. The judgment was that appellee take nothing by his action, and that appellant have and recover of and from appellee its costs,, which, by the judgment, were taxed in the sum of $10. This appeal is from “that portion of said judgment fixing and taxing costs.”

The judgment was entered on February 27, 1939. This appeal was taken on May 26, 1939. Appellant specifies as error the District Court’s refusal “to set aside the refusal of the clerk to tax as costs an item of $í.50” claimed by appellant. That refusal (by the court) occurred on November 7, 1939, long after this appeal was taken. It, therefore, cannot be reviewed on this appeal. No other error is specified.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F.2d 59, 24 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 873, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-asher-ca9-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack