United States v. Ashekul Mowla

544 F. App'x 543
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 6, 2013
Docket13-50787
StatusUnpublished

This text of 544 F. App'x 543 (United States v. Ashekul Mowla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ashekul Mowla, 544 F. App'x 543 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Ashekul Mowla has been charged with conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess with the intent to distribute a controlled substance and controlled substance analogue and conspiring to commit money laundering. See 18 U.S.C. § 956(h); 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), 846. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s order of detention pending his trial. Mowla contends that he is not a flight risk or a danger to the community.

*544 The record evidence supports the district court’s determination that no conditions exist that would reasonably assure Mowla’s appearance and the safety of the community where he is to be released pending trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Mowla’s release pending trial. United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798-99 (5th Cir.1989).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William Bruce Hare
873 F.2d 796 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Mauricio Rueben and Gerardo Guerra
974 F.2d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
544 F. App'x 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashekul-mowla-ca5-2013.