United States v. Ashcroft Mfg. Co.

176 F. 736, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 1910
DocketNo. 144 (2,041)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 F. 736 (United States v. Ashcroft Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ashcroft Mfg. Co., 176 F. 736, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301 (2d Cir. 1910).

Opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The article in question is a “strip” of glass. It is “a narrow piece comparatively long.” Standard Dictionary. While not so ground that any [737]*737sides in themselves form a prism, yet one side is so ground that prismatic forms are produced upon it. The strip of glass, though not a prism, fulfills the functions of one. That is its essential feature. As, then, this article is a strip of glass ground so as to. constitute a prism and possesses optical properties, we think that it is mofe specifically described in paragraph 310, which is among the paragraphs relating to glass articles possessing such properties, than it is in paragraph" 100, which would include it only because it is ground glass.

The decision of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pheoll Manufacturing Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 223 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)
Burgess Battery Co. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 28 (U.S. Customs Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. 736, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashcroft-mfg-co-ca2-1910.