United States v. Arvin Red Star

451 F. App'x 708
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2011
Docket10-30351
StatusUnpublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 708 (United States v. Arvin Red Star) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Arvin Red Star, 451 F. App'x 708 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arvin Bon Red Star appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 216-month sentence for aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 2241(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Red Star contends that the district court improperly applied a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 for restraining his victim during the commission of the offense. Red Star argues that there was no evidence of physical restraint presented at trial, and that any evidence of physical restraint had already been taken into account by the statute and the sentencing Guidelines.

The record supports the district court’s application of the enhancement because the evidence shows that Red Star physically restrained the victim in such a way that “added to the basic crime.” United States v. Old Chief, 571 F.3d 898, 901 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. Foppe, 993 F.2d 1444, 1452-53 (9th Cir.1993) (defining physical restraint). Restraint of the victim is not an element of the offense of aggravated sexual abuse nor was it was incorporated in the aggravated sexual abuse offense Guideline applied here. See 18 U.S.C. § 2241; U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1. Accordingly, the district court did not err by increasing Red Star’s base offense level two levels under § 3A1.3. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 cmt. n. 2; Old Chief, 571 F.3d at 900.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Glenn Randal Foppe
993 F.2d 1444 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Old Chief
571 F.3d 898 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arvin-red-star-ca9-2011.