United States v. Artt

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Artt

249 F.3d 831

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 2000

DocketNos. 97-10386, 97-10387 and 97-10390

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.3d 831 (United States v. Artt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Artt, 249 F.3d 831 (9th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[832]*832ORDER

The appeals are dismissed as moot in the cases of Kevin John Artt, No. 97-10386, Pol Brennan, No. 97-10387, and Terence Damien Kirby, No. 97-10390.

We remand to the district court with direction that it withdraw its opinion and order for extradition and dismiss the cases as moot upon the receipt of the United Kingdom’s diplomatic note withdrawing its request for extradition of these appellants.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[832]*832ORDER

The appeals are dismissed as moot in the cases of Kevin John Artt, No. 97-10386, Pol Brennan, No. 97-10387, and Terence Damien Kirby, No. 97-10390.

We remand to the district court with direction that it withdraw its opinion and order for extradition and dismiss the cases as moot upon the receipt of the United Kingdom’s diplomatic note withdrawing its request for extradition of these appellants.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.3d 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-artt-ca9-2000.