United States v. Arthur Tarricone, John Pabone, Dominic A. Bombace, John Barberio and Marat Balagula
11 F.3d 24, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31550
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 3, 1993·No. 1176·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
11 F.3d 24w
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Arthur TARRICONE, John Pabone, Dominic A. Bombace, Defendants,
John Barberio and Marat Balagula, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 1175, 1176, Dockets 92-1622, 92-1687.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 1, 1993.
Decided Dec. 3, 1993.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 21 F.3d 374
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Arthur Tarricone, John Pabone, Dominic A. Bombace, John Barberio and Marat Balagula, 11 F.3d 24, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31550 (2d Cir. 1993).
11 F.3d 24 (United States v. Arthur Tarricone, John Pabone, Dominic A. Bombace, John Barberio and Marat Balagula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Macchia
845 F. Supp. 953 (E.D. New York, 1994)