United States v. Arthur Roy Freeman, A/K/A Lawrence Kenneth Freeman

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Arthur Roy Freeman, A/K/A Lawrence Kenneth Freeman

427 F.2d 140, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8946

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 2, 1970·No. 28698·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a Dyer Act conviction. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. 1 The evidence was more than ample to support the jury verdict of guilty. There was no error in the charge to the jury nor in the refusal to charge. See Orser v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 362 F.2d 580, 582, on the charge, and United States v. Sutton, 5 Cir., 1969, 411 F.2d 405, 406, on the elements of the offense.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a Dyer Act conviction. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. 1 The evidence was more than ample to support the jury verdict of guilty. There was no error in the charge to the jury nor in the refusal to charge. See Orser v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 362 F.2d 580, 582, on the charge, and United States v. Sutton, 5 Cir., 1969, 411 F.2d 405, 406, on the elements of the offense.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

United States v. Arthur Roy Freeman, A/K/A Lawrence Kenneth Freeman, 427 F.2d 140, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8946 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

427 F.2d 140 (United States v. Arthur Roy Freeman, A/K/A Lawrence Kenneth Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related