United States v. Arthur Moates

968 F.2d 1212, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23830, 1992 WL 159775
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 13, 1992·No. 91-7314·Unpublished

Opinion

968 F.2d 1212

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur MOATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7314.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 1, 1992
Decided: July 13, 1992

Arthur Moates, Appellant Pro Se.

John William McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Moates appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United Stats v. Moates, Nos. CR-86-92, CA-89-2713-6-3-K (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arthur Moates, 968 F.2d 1212, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23830, 1992 WL 159775 (4th Cir. 1992).

968 F.2d 1212 (United States v. Arthur Moates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related