United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry
This text of United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry (United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_____________
No. 95-3122MN _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Arthur Lee McGilberry, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: December 29, 1995
Filed: January 8, 1996 _____________
Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Lee McGilberry appeals the drug-related sentence imposed by the district court under the sentencing guidelines. McGilberry's sentencing arguments are clearly foreclosed by this court's recent decisions in United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1219-20 (8th Cir. 1995), and United States v. Higgs, No. 95-1928, 1995 WL 716193 at *1 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 1995) (per curiam). Because the controlling law is clear, we affirm without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-l-mcgilberry-ca8-1996.