United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 8, 1996·No. 95-3122·Unpublished

Opinion

No. 95-3122MN

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota.

*

Arthur Lee McGilberry, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

Submitted: December 29, 1995

Filed: January 8, 1996

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Lee McGilberry appeals the drug-related sentence imposed by the district court under the sentencing guidelines. McGilberry's sentencing arguments are clearly foreclosed by this court's recent decisions in United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1219-20 (8th Cir. 1995), and United States v. Higgs, No. 95-1928, 1995 WL 716193 at *1 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 1995) (per curiam). Because the controlling law is clear, we affirm without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry, (8th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry (United States v. Arthur L. McGilberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Allen Scott Jackson
64 F.3d 1213 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Jason D. Higgs
72 F.3d 69 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)