United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman

245 F.2d 244, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 602, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5286
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 8, 1957·No. 12720_1·Published

Opinion

245 F.2d 244

57-1 USTC P 9667

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Arthur E. HERBKERSMAN and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, Appellees.

No. 12720.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 8, 1957.

Hugh K. Martin and Richard H. Pennington, Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, and Harlan Pomeroy, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Arthur E. Herbkersman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court, D.C., 133 F.Supp. 495, is affirmed upon the authority of Haynes v. United States, 353 U.S. 81, 77 S.Ct. 649, 1 L.Ed.2d 671.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, 245 F.2d 244, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 602, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5286 (6th Cir. 1957).

245 F.2d 244 (United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynes v. United States
353 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Herbkersman v. United States
133 F. Supp. 495 (S.D. Ohio, 1955)