United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman
This text of 245 F.2d 244 (United States v. Arthur E. Herbkersman and Beatrice E. Herbkersman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
245 F.2d 244
57-1 USTC P 9667
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Arthur E. HERBKERSMAN and Beatrice E. Herbkersman, Appellees.
No. 12720.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 8, 1957.
Hugh K. Martin and Richard H. Pennington, Cincinnati, Ohio, H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, and Harlan Pomeroy, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Arthur E. Herbkersman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.
Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and STARR, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court, D.C., 133 F.Supp. 495, is affirmed upon the authority of Haynes v. United States, 353 U.S. 81, 77 S.Ct. 649, 1 L.Ed.2d 671.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 F.2d 244, 52 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 602, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 5286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-e-herbkersman-and-beatrice--ca6-1957.