United States v. Arthur Boyles, No. 30827 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
This text of 446 F.2d 44 (United States v. Arthur Boyles, No. 30827 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
446 F.2d 44
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur BOYLES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 30827 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 1, 1971, Rehearing Denied July 16, 1971.
Gerald Kogan, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Robert W. Rush, U.S. Atty., J. V. Eskenazi, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:
A careful study of the briefs and record in this case reveals that the trial court's comments were not prejudicial in light of all of the facts and circumstances of the trial, and that any possible error was harmless. Leonard v. United States, 386 F.2d 423 (5th Cir. 1967).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F.2d 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-boyles-no-30827-summary-calendar-rule-18-5th-ca5-1971.