United States v. Arthur Boyles

446 F.2d 44
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 16, 1971·No. 30827·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A careful study of the briefs and record in this case reveals that the trial court’s comments were not prejudicial in light of all of the facts and circumstances of the trial, and that any possible error was harmless. Leonard v. United States, 386 F.2d 423 (5th Cir. 1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arthur Boyles, 446 F.2d 44 (5th Cir. 1971).

446 F.2d 44 (United States v. Arthur Boyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John M. Leonard v. United States
386 F.2d 423 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)