United States v. Arthur Bibo
This text of 182 F.2d 352 (United States v. Arthur Bibo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
182 F.2d 352
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Arthur BIBO.
No. 3805.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
June 9, 1950.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
A. Devitt Vanech, Assistant Attorney General, and John F. Cotter, Fred W. Smith and Roger P. Marquis, Attorneys, Department of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., and Everett M. Grantham, United States Attorney, and Maurice Sanchez, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, N. M., for appellant.
Seth & Montgomery, Santa Fe, N. M., for appellee.
Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of District Court vacated and cause remanded May 9, 1950, with directions to dismiss the cause of action, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 F.2d 352, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-bibo-ca10-1950.