United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery

767 F.2d 1494, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 12, 1985

Docket84-3084

StatusPublished

This text of 767 F.2d 1494 (United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Arthur B. Avery, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery, 767 F.2d 1494, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207 (11th Cir. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

*1495 PER CURIAM:

On petition for panel rehearing, appellant Arthur Avery urges that we failed to analyze the prosecutor’s alleged improper vouching remarks in the context of the entire trial as required by United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Even assuming the prosecutor’s remarks exceeded permissible bounds, we would still conclude that any error was harmless. United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1045 n. 10, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985).

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by appellant Arthur B. Avery, Sr., filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1495 PER CURIAM:

On petition for panel rehearing, appellant Arthur Avery urges that we failed to analyze the prosecutor’s alleged improper vouching remarks in the context of the entire trial as required by United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Even assuming the prosecutor’s remarks exceeded permissible bounds, we would still conclude that any error was harmless. United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1045 n. 10, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985).

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by appellant Arthur B. Avery, Sr., filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

767 F.2d 1494, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-b-avery-sr-and-alisa-d-avery-ca11-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack