United States v. Arthur Alex Sirmans, No. 71-1025 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)
This text of 444 F.2d 119 (United States v. Arthur Alex Sirmans, No. 71-1025 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
444 F.2d 119
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur Alex SIRMANS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1025 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 431 F.2d 409, Part
I (5th Cir. 1970).
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 14, 1971.
Larry Bodiford, Panama City Fla., (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
William Stafford, U.S. Atty., Clinton Ashmore, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; David L. Middlebrooks, Jr., District Judge.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
The appellant contends that the guilty verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence and that there is no sufficient substantial evidence to support the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-alex-sirmans-no-71-1025-summary-calendar-rule-ca5-1971.