United States v. Arthur A. McDonald
This text of 438 F.2d 1237 (United States v. Arthur A. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment must be affirmed on the authority of Harris v. United States, 1959, 359 U.S. 19, 79 S.Ct. 560, 3 L.Ed.2d 597. We find nothing in Turner v. United States, 1970, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 that weakens the authority of Harris. Failure of the court to instruct on the so-called presumption contained in 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) did not prejudice McDonald. No instruction on the subject was requested. The jury could, and perhaps did, apply the presumption, although the court did not tell them about it. The court did correctly tell the jury the necessary elements of the offense. There was evidence from which the necessary elements could be inferred. See Turner, supra, 396 U.S. at 421-422, 90 S.Ct. 642.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.2d 1237, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arthur-a-mcdonald-ca9-1971.