United States v. Arrendondo-Gutierrez

32 F. App'x 485
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2002·No. No. 01-10079; D.C. No. CR-00-01289-JMR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rosauro Arrendondo-Gutierrez appeals the 46-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we vacate and remand.

We review de novo to determine whether the aggravated felony provision of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) is applicable to a particular conviction for illegal re-entry af[486] ter deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). United States v. Trinidad-Aquino, 259 F.3d 1140,1142 (9th Cir.2001). Arrendondo-Gutierrez contends the district court erred by enhancing his sentence for his two prior felony convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) in violation of Cal. Veh.Code §§ 23152, 23550.

After the district court rendered its decision in this case, we reviewed this issue and concluded that DUI could not be counted as an aggravated felony. See Trinidadr-Aquino, 259 F.3d at 1146 (holding Cal. Veh.Code § 23153 was not a crime of violence); United States v. Portillo-Mendoza, 273 F.3d 1224, 1228 (9th Cir. 2001) (Cal. Veh.Code § 23152). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with PortilloMendoza.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arrendondo-Gutierrez, 32 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2002).

32 F. App'x 485 (United States v. Arrendondo-Gutierrez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Miguel Trinidad-Aquino
259 F.3d 1140 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Mario Portillo-Mendoza
273 F.3d 1224 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)