United States v. Arnoldo Veloz Hernandez

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Arnoldo Veloz Hernandez

37 F.3d 1510, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35643, 1994 WL 548923

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedOctober 7, 1994

Docket93-2250

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1510 (United States v. Arnoldo Veloz Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Arnoldo Veloz Hernandez, 37 F.3d 1510, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35643, 1994 WL 548923 (10th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1510
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arnoldo Veloz HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-2250.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1994.

Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court denying pro se petitioner's motion to correct or reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3742 or Fed. R.Crim. Proc. 35(a). The district court correctly determined that the defendant was not illegally sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The district court correctly determined that it had no grounds for correcting or reducing the sentence under Fed. R.Crim. Proc. 35. The sentence in this case was affirmed in United States v. Hernandez, 967 F.2d 456 (10th Cir.1992). The order of the district court is AFFIRMED. The appeal is DISMISSED.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1510
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arnoldo Veloz HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-2250.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 7, 1994.

Before TACHA, BRORBY and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order of the district court denying pro se petitioner's motion to correct or reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3742 or Fed. R.Crim. Proc. 35(a). The district court correctly determined that the defendant was not illegally sentenced under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The district court correctly determined that it had no grounds for correcting or reducing the sentence under Fed. R.Crim. Proc. 35. The sentence in this case was affirmed in United States v. Hernandez, 967 F.2d 456 (10th Cir.1992). The order of the district court is AFFIRMED. The appeal is DISMISSED.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1510, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35643, 1994 WL 548923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arnoldo-veloz-hernandez-ca10-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack