United States v. Arnold Stonehill, Michael Gruber
This text of 441 F.2d 1167 (United States v. Arnold Stonehill, Michael Gruber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants Stonehill and Gruber appeal from their convictions for violations of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (sale of cocaine without an order form). They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain their judgments.
We have examined the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, and we conclude that the evidence is ample to support the convictions. (United States v. Nelson (9th Cir. 1969) 419 F.2d 1237.) Although neither appellant personally participated in the transfer of cocaine, there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could properly have concluded that the transferor was appellants’ agent.
The judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F.2d 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arnold-stonehill-michael-gruber-ca9-1971.