United States v. Arnold E. Vandersee, the State of California, Intervenor
296 F.2d 734
This text of 296 F.2d 734 (United States v. Arnold E. Vandersee, the State of California, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Arnold E. Vandersee, the State of California, Intervenor, 296 F.2d 734 (3d Cir. 1961).
Opinion
We agree with Judge Meaney in the district court that the latter does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine appellant’s “Motion for Restraining Order” filed February 15, 1961.
The order of the district court of April 10, 1961, dismissing said motion will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
296 F.2d 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arnold-e-vandersee-the-state-of-california-intervenor-ca3-1961.