United States v. Arnold
74 M.J. 361, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 373
This text of 74 M.J. 361 (United States v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Arnold, 74 M.J. 361, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 373 (Ark. 2015).
Opinion
CCA 201200382. On consideration of the motions filed by Lieutenant Carrie E. Theis, for leave to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned other counsel to represent said Appellants and that the new attorney has assumed the representation of said Appellants. Accordingly, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 361, 2015 CAAF LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arnold-armfor-2015.