United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M.. Read the opinion of the Court — 431 F.3d 994
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided December 21, 2005·No. 03-3297·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 21, 2005

Before

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] Appeals from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for Cross-Appellant, ] the Northern District of ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Nos. 03-3297 and 03-3412 v. ] ] No. 02 CR 892 ENAMM M. ARNAOUT, ] Defendant-Appellant, ] Cross-Appellee. ] Suzanne B. Conlon, Judge.

Upon consideration of the GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO AMEND THE OPINION, filed on December 12, 2005, by counsel for the appellee/cross-appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The opinion is modified as follows: on page eight of the slip copy, the word “domestic” is omitted from the section heading, the second line of the new section, and the eleventh line of the section heading.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M., (7th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M. (United States v. Arnaout, Enaam M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.