United States v. Arnaldo Carrera

111 F.3d 135, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13435, 1997 WL 177451
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 1997
Docket96-1570
StatusUnpublished

This text of 111 F.3d 135 (United States v. Arnaldo Carrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Arnaldo Carrera, 111 F.3d 135, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13435, 1997 WL 177451 (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

111 F.3d 135

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Arnaldo CARRERA, Appellant.

No. 96-1570NE.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 1997.
Filed April 15, 1997.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arnaldo Carrera challenges the 54-month sentence imposed by the district court after Carrera pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine. Carrera also admitted that $49,402.00 was forfeitable. Carrera's counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Carrera filed a supplemental brief. Contrary to Carrera's view, after the district court departs downward from the guidelines range, the extent of the district court's departure is unreviewable. See United States v. Left Hand Bull, 901 F.2d 647, 650 (8th Cir.1990). We decline to consider Carrera's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. See United States v. Logan, 49 F.3d 352, 361 (8th Cir.1995). Otherwise, we conclude the arguments raised in the briefs filed by Carrera and his counsel are without merit. Finding no other nonfriviolous issues for appeal, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Merle Left Hand Bull
901 F.2d 647 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Darrell P. Logan
49 F.3d 352 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F.3d 135, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13435, 1997 WL 177451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arnaldo-carrera-ca8-1997.