United States v. Armando Tagle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ARMANDO JIMENEZ TAGLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cr-00295-MOC-DCK-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Armando Jimenez Tagle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Armando Jimenez Tagle appeals the district court’s order

denying without prejudice his motion to dismiss his criminal

indictment, conviction, and sentence for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Tagle, No.

3:12-cr-00295-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2015). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this Court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED