United States v. Armando Silex

907 F.2d 488, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265, 1990 WL 99346
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 18, 1990
Docket89-8008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 907 F.2d 488 (United States v. Armando Silex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Armando Silex, 907 F.2d 488, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265, 1990 WL 99346 (5th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED.

We withdraw our unpublished opinion affirming the enhanced sentence of Silex, based on our Circuit’s formerly controlling *489 authority of United States v. Leonard, 868 F.2d 1393 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2585, 110 L.Ed.2d 266 (1990). Leonard’s reasoning is rejected by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). We therefore VACATE the sentence of Silex and REMAND this cause for proceedings consistent with the opinion in Taylor. It is so

ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Charles Gene Maines
920 F.2d 1525 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 F.2d 488, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265, 1990 WL 99346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-armando-silex-ca5-1990.