United States v. Armando Silex

907 F.2d 488, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265, 1990 WL 99346
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 18, 1990·No. 89-8008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED.

We withdraw our unpublished opinion affirming the enhanced sentence of Silex, based on our Circuit’s formerly controlling *489 authority of United States v. Leonard, 868 F.2d 1393 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2585, 110 L.Ed.2d 266 (1990). Leonard’s reasoning is rejected by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). We therefore VACATE the sentence of Silex and REMAND this cause for proceedings consistent with the opinion in Taylor. It is so

ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Armando Silex, 907 F.2d 488, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265, 1990 WL 99346 (5th Cir. 1990).

907 F.2d 488 (United States v. Armando Silex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Charles Gene Maines
920 F.2d 1525 (Tenth Circuit, 1990)