United States v. Armando Cardon-Cortez

322 F. App'x 659
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 2009
Docket08-13088
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 322 F. App'x 659 (United States v. Armando Cardon-Cortez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Armando Cardon-Cortez, 322 F. App'x 659 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George F. Murphy, Kenneth R. Ridleho-over, and Spiro T. Kypreos, appointed counsel for Armando Cardon-Cortez, George Arman Salmoran-Calderon, and Jorge Gomez-Montes in this direct criminal appeal, have moved to withdraw from further representation and filed briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsels’ motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Cardon-Cortez, Salmoran-Calderon, and Gomez-Montes’ convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardon-Cortez v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 206 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-armando-cardon-cortez-ca11-2009.