United States v. Arlin Ernest Wright, Jr.
This text of 57 F.3d 1067 (United States v. Arlin Ernest Wright, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arlin Ernest WRIGHT, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-7044.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 1995.
Decided: June 14, 1995.
Arlin Ernest Wright, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kenneth Martin Sorenson, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-91-39; CA-93-540-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21784, 1995 WL 354876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arlin-ernest-wright-jr-ca4-1995.