United States v. Arketa Willis

293 F. App'x 426
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 2008
Docket07-2997
StatusUnpublished

This text of 293 F. App'x 426 (United States v. Arketa Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Arketa Willis, 293 F. App'x 426 (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Arketa Willis pleaded guilty to traveling in interstate commerce with intent to distribute the proceeds of an unlawful activity (namely, possession with intent to distribute and distribution of controlled substances) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(1). At sentencing, the district court 1 rejected Willis’s position that her *427 base offense level should be 6 under U.S.S.G. § 2E1.2(a)(l). Rather, finding that the seized currency ($100,950) was the proceeds of marijuana sales, the court converted the currency into 36.6 kilograms of marijuana to arrive at a base offense level of 18. See U.S.S.G. § 2E1.2(a)(2) (use offense level applicable to underlying unlawful activity in respect to which travel was undertaken), § 2Dl.l(a)(3), (c)(ll). The court then sentenced Willis to 41 months in prison. She appeals, arguing that the district court’s findings of fact for an upward adjustment under section 2E1.2(a)(2) were clearly erroneous because insufficient evidence existed of any underlying offense.

We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that the seized currency represented the proceeds of marijuana distribution for purposes of applying section 2E1.2(a)(2). Likewise, we see no clear error in the court’s conversion of the currency into a drug quantity. See United States v. King, 518 F.3d 571, 575 (8th Cir.2008).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. King
518 F.3d 571 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 F. App'x 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arketa-willis-ca8-2008.