United States v. Arkadie
This text of 111 F. App'x 775 (United States v. Arkadie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kelly Arkadie, federal prisoner # 43494-080, appeals the district court’s June 30, 2003, denial of various postjudgment motions in his criminal case and the imposition of sanctions. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal. Because Arkadie has not identified any errors in the district court’s June 30 ruling, it is as if had not appealed. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). The Government’s motion is GRANTED.
The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file its appellate brief is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.
Arkadie has moved for the disqualification of district court judge Janis Jack for bias. This motion is DENIED. See Delesdernier v. Porterie, 666 F.2d 116, 121-22 (5th Cir.1982).
Arkadie’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir.1982).
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.
*776 MOTIONS FOR DISQUALIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 F. App'x 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arkadie-ca5-2004.