United States v. Arellano-Ochoa
This text of 329 F. App'x 163 (United States v. Arellano-Ochoa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Arellano-Ochoa appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Arellano-Ochoa contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately consider all of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that his sentence is excessive in light of his mitigating circumstances. The district court did not procedurally err and Arellano-Ochoa’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arellano-ochoa-ca9-2009.