United States v. Aranda
This text of 693 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Aranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Aranda pleaded guilty to a conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)), a drug trafficking conspiracy (21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846), and discharge of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and drug trafficking crime (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)). We have jurisdiction of Aranda’s appeal of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291.1
The government concedes that the district court erred in applying a discharge of firearm enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2), because Aranda was also sentenced for discharging a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). See United States v. Aquino, 242 F.3d 859, 863-65 (9th Cir. 2001). We agree, and therefore vacate Aranda’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing on an open record. See United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885-86 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc).
VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aranda-ca9-2017.