United States v. Anyanso Agwu

271 F. App'x 546
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2008
Docket07-2791
StatusUnpublished

This text of 271 F. App'x 546 (United States v. Anyanso Agwu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Anyanso Agwu, 271 F. App'x 546 (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anyanso Agwu pled guilty to felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 188 months in prison after being classified as an armed career criminal. He appeals, arguing that this classification was improper because his prior drug convictions should have been treated as a single criminal episode instead of three separate felonies.

The Armed Career Criminal Act provides for enhanced penalties for defendants with three prior convictions for violent felony or drug offenses which were “committed on occasions different from one another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Agwu contends that because his prior offenses were committed on three successive days, were charged in the same indictment, and resulted in concurrent sentences, they should be treated as a single prior conviction. Agwu’s argument appears to be derived from the career offender provision in the federal sentencing guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, rather than from § 4B1.4, the guideline under which he was sentenced as an armed career offender. The critical sentencing issue under § 924(e) is whether Agwu’s prior offenses were committed on different occasions. See United States v. Mason, 440 F.3d 1056, 1057-58 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. Speakman, 330 F.3d 1080, 1082 (8th Cir.2003); United States v. McDile, 914 F.2d 1059, 1061 (8th Cir.1990). Since Agwu’s offenses were each committed on a different day, the district court 1 did not err in applying U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 in sentencing him under *547 the Armed Career Criminal Act. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Lee McDile
914 F.2d 1059 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Michael Speakman
330 F.3d 1080 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Ivan Excel Mason
440 F.3d 1056 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-anyanso-agwu-ca8-2008.