United States v. Antonnyer Morrison

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 2020
Docket19-10598
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Antonnyer Morrison (United States v. Antonnyer Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Antonnyer Morrison, (5th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

Case: 19-10598 Document: 00515358688 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 19-10598 Fifth Circuit

FILED Summary Calendar March 25, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

ANTONNYER DERREL MORRISON, also known as Tony,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:18-CR-480-1

Before OWEN, Chief Judge, and SOUTHWICK and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Antonnyer Derrel Morrison appeals the 60-month upward departure sentence he received after pleading guilty to interfering with commerce by robbery and aiding and abetting. Morrison contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. We affirm. Morrison’s 60-month sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v. Key, 599 F.3d 469, 475

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 19-10598 Document: 00515358688 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/25/2020

No. 19-10598

(5th Cir. 2010). Contrary to Morrison’s assertion, the district court considered his arguments for a within-guidelines sentence but ultimately found them unavailing. Morrison’s disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors is not grounds for vacating his upward departure sentence. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Key
599 F.3d 469 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Antonnyer Morrison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonnyer-morrison-ca5-2020.