United States v. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes

560 F. App'x 635
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2014
Docket13-3784
StatusUnpublished

This text of 560 F. App'x 635 (United States v. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Antonio Ventura-Fuentes, 560 F. App'x 635 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Ventura-Fuentes directly appeals the downward-departure sentence *636 imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. On appeal, counsel for Ventura-Fuentes seeks to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that Ventura-Fuentes’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Burns, 577 F.3d 887, 894-896 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc) (appellate review of departure sentence). Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues. Therefore, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Burns
577 F.3d 887 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 F. App'x 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-ventura-fuentes-ca8-2014.