United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox

736 F.2d 509, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21059

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox. Read the opinion of the Court — 764 F.2d 558 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 27, 1984·No. 83-1036·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox, 736 F.2d 509, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21059 (9th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

736 F.2d 509 (United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.