United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox

736 F.2d 509, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21059

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1984

Docket83-1036

StatusPublished

This text of 736 F.2d 509 (United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Antonio Pino Palafox, 736 F.2d 509, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21059 (9th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be heard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 F.2d 509, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-pino-palafox-ca9-1984.