United States v. Antonio Padilla Caballero

398 F.2d 628, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6191
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1968
Docket30775
StatusPublished

This text of 398 F.2d 628 (United States v. Antonio Padilla Caballero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Antonio Padilla Caballero, 398 F.2d 628, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6191 (2d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

398 F.2d 628

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Antonio Padilla CABALLERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 495, Docket 30775.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 9, 1968.
Decided July 8, 1968.

Theodore Krieger, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Pierre N. Leval, Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., and David M. Dorsen, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial for the reasons stated in this court's opinion in United States v. Tarrago, 398 F.2d 621 (2 Cir. 1968), decided July 3, 1968.

LUMBARD, Chief Judge (concurring):

I concur in the result for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in United States v. Tarrago, 398 F.2d at 621 (2d Cir. 1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. John D. Tarrago
398 F.2d 621 (Second Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 F.2d 628, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-padilla-caballero-ca2-1968.