United States v. Antonio Padilla Caballero
This text of 398 F.2d 628 (United States v. Antonio Padilla Caballero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
398 F.2d 628
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Antonio Padilla CABALLERO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 495, Docket 30775.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued May 9, 1968.
Decided July 8, 1968.
Theodore Krieger, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Pierre N. Leval, Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., and David M. Dorsen, Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial for the reasons stated in this court's opinion in United States v. Tarrago, 398 F.2d 621 (2 Cir. 1968), decided July 3, 1968.
LUMBARD, Chief Judge (concurring):
I concur in the result for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in United States v. Tarrago, 398 F.2d at 621 (2d Cir. 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 F.2d 628, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-padilla-caballero-ca2-1968.