United States v. Antonio Metcalf, Sr.

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 25-2125

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Antonio Damher Metcalf, Sr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

____________

Submitted: October 28, 2025 Filed: November 4, 2025

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Metcalf appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release.

His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief arguing that the district court erred in concluding he violated the conditions of his supervised release.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not clearly err by finding that the government proved the violations by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Staten, 990 F.3d 631, 635 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.